XRP Holder Bull's are Coming as SEC Must Surrender Hinman Email on Ether to Ripple, Judge Rules

XRP Holder Bull's are Coming as SEC Must Surrender Hinman Email on Ether to Ripple, Judge Rules

According to a federal judge, an email containing a draft of the former SEC official's speech is not covered by agency privilege.


A judge ordered Thursday that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must provide an email containing a draft of former director William Hinman's statement on whether ether is security to Ripple as part of ongoing litigation launched by the regulatory agency against the crypto company.

At the end of 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple and its executives, alleging that they sold and continue to sell the XRP cryptocurrency in violation of federal securities laws. The agency and Ripple have been in a long-running back-and-forth regarding what information must be made accessible through the discovery process. Ripple has requested many records outlining internal SEC interactions and policies.

SEC attorneys, for their part, have claimed that these documents contain staffer deliberations, and therefore are protected against discovery. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn of the Southern District of New York ruled that some of these documents are protected but ordered the regulator to turn over others, including an email with Hinman's speech and some notes from meetings between SEC staff and third parties that are not Ripple.

"We're pleased with the Court's order, which grants Ripple access to important documents that the SEC was withholding. We will continue to aggressively defend this case – and we remain optimistic that resolution of this case will provide much-needed clarity to the industry," Ripple General Counsel Stu Alderoty said.

The SEC did not respond to a CoinDesk request for comment.

An email of a draft of a 2018 speech by former Director of Corporation Finance Hinman is included in the list of the documents to be surrendered. Hinman gave the speech in June 2018, telling the audience at a conference that ether was not security in his view.

The speech was seen as pivotal for the crypto industry, given the first 60 million ether (the native token of the Ethereum blockchain) was sold to raise funds for the Ethereum Foundation. Ether is now commonly seen as a commodity in the U.S., with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission overseeing derivatives products based on the cryptocurrency.

Hinman's speech reflected his views, he said at the time, a point the judge referenced on Thursday in her ruling.

"The personal views of agency employees are not protected by the privilege unless they bear on 'the formulation or exercise of policy-oriented judgment,'" the judge said in a 23-page ruling. "...Accordingly, emails concerning the speech or draft versions are neither pre decisional nor deliberative agency documents entitled to protection."

While the email with the draft speech must be turned over, a separate email sent by the Office of the Chief Counsel for Corporation Finance the day before his speech does not need to be turned over, the judge wrote.

"The documents related to SEC staff's legal analysis of XRP contained the SEC's staff preliminary views during the Division of Enforcement's investigation into XRP and did not present a recommendation to the SEC," she said.

These documents were prepared for the investigation into XRP and therefore qualified as "the kind of pre-decisional and deliberative legal analysis the deliberative process privilege protects."

The SEC also does not have to turn over notes from meetings between SEC staffers and Ripple, as well as interagency discussions, the judge ruled.

Other documents the SEC will keep privilege over including communications between SEC crypto czar Valerie Szczepanik and U.S. Treasury Department officials and a presentation she made for former SEC Commissioner Michael Piwowar.

Overall, Ripple sought access to 14 entries and three additional documents.

"The SEC is further ordered to review its privilege log and produce, in full or in part, any documents previously withheld based on the privilege that would be inconsistent with this order," Judge Netburn wrote. Source

Featured Brokers